Home
/
Área Acadêmica
/
Disciplinas
/
Tecnologia, Mudança e Instituições

Tecnologia, Mudança e Instituições

Publicado 6/3/2024, 5:00:30 PM, última modificação 4/30/2025, 9:45:40 AM

Modelos de análise das organizações e da gestão tecnológica. Dimensões ambientais técnica e institucional. Mudança. Tecnologias intensivas e adoção de práticas. Identificação de causas, relações e as prováveis consequências do desenvolvimento tecnológico sobre as práticas das organizações. Ampliação da perspectiva dos estudos sobre a mudança.

Bibliografia da Disciplina:

Básica:

  • ANDERSSON, T., & GADOLIN, C. (2020). Understanding institutional work through social interaction in highly institutionalized settings: lessons from public healthcare organizations. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 36(2), 101107.
  • ANTERO, C.A.S., RODRIGUES, C.T., EMMENDOERFER, M.L., & DALLABRIDA, V.R. (2020). Public Policy to support the development of APL’s: an impact analysis in Minas Gerais, Brazil. Cadernos Ebape.BR, 18(1), 61-73.
  • AWAD, I.M., & ALNATSHA, N.A. (2023). CSV Strategy and clustering for improvement of the stone and marble sector’s competitiveness: empirical evidence from Hebron. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1-22.
  • BERGER, P. L.; LUCKMANN, T. A construção social da realidade: tratado de sociologia do conhecimento. 25. ed. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2005.
  • BRAUN, V., & CLARKE, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328-352.
  • CARDINALE, I. (2018). Beyond constraining and enabling: toward new microfoundations for institutional theory. Academy of Management Review, 43(1), 132-155.
  • CASSANEGO, P.V., BOAVENTURA, J.M.G., AZEVEDO, A.C., & TELLES, R. (2019). Governance in business clusters: proposal for an application of an analytical model. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 31(9-10), 984-1010.
  • CASSIOLATO, J.E., & LASTRES, H.M.M. (2020). The framework of ‘local productive and innovation systems and its influence on STI policy in Brazil. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 29(1), 1-15.
  • DIMAGGIO, P. J.; POWELL, W. W. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, v. 48, n. 8, p. 147-160, 1983.
  • DOVER, G.; LAWRENCE, T. B. A gap year for institutional theory: integrating the study of institutional work and participatory action research. Journal of Management Inquiry, v. 19, n. 4, p. 305-316, 2010.
  • FORRER, V., PLECHERO, M., ROSSI, A., & SANTINI, E. (2022). Top-down and bottom-up legitimization of emerging industries: evidence from two Italian mechatronics clusters. Regional Studies, 56(4), 656-667.
  • FUSCH, P.I., & NESS, L.R. (2015). Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. Qualitative Report, 20(9), 1408-1416.
  • GERKE, A., BENSON-REA, M., & ODLIN, D. (2023). SME upgrading in emerging market clusters: The case of Taiwan’s bicycle industry. Journal of Business Research, 164, 113967.
  • GIDDENS, A. (2009). A constituição da sociedade. 3. ed. São Paulo: Martins Fontes.
  • GONÇALVES, S. A. Mudança estratégica, esquemas interpretativos e contexto institucional: um estudo de caso longitudinal. Revista Eletrônica de Ciência Administrativa, v. 6, n. 2, p. 1-28, 2007.
  • GRANOVETTER, M. (2017). Society and Economy: framework and principles. Cambridge: Belknap.
  • GREENWOOD, R.; SUDDABY, R.; HININGS, C. R. Theorizing change: the role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal, v. 45, n. 1, p. 58-80, 2002.
  • JACOMETTI, M.; GONÇALVES, S. A.; BONFIM, LEANDRO R. C.; OLIVEIRA, L. C. Adherence to governance patterns: how institutional work and knowledge dissemination influence the institutionalization of Brazilian Industrial Clusters? RBGN-Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, v. 26, p. 1/ e20230146-22, 2024.
  • JASTRAM, S.M., OTTO, A.H., & MINULLA, T. (2023). Diverse organizational adoption of institutions in the field of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 183(4), 1073-1088.
  • KANO, L., NARULA, R., & SURDU, I. (2022). Global value chain resilience: Understanding the impact of managerial governance adaptations. California Management Review, 64(2), 24-45.
  • KELLER, J. (2019). Connecting the tree to the rainforest: examining the microfoundations of institutions with cultural consensus theory. In P. Haack, J. Sieweke, & L. Wessel, Microfoundations of institutions (pp. 197-215). Bingley: Emerald.
  • KOSTOVA, T., & ROTH, K. (2002). Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 215-233.
  • LAWRENCE, T.B., & SUDDABY, R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In S.R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T.B. Lawrence, & W.R. Nord. Handbook of organization studies (pp. 215-254). London: Sage.
  • MACHADO-DA-SILVA, C. L.; GUARIDO FILHO, E. R.; ROSSONI, L; Campos organizacionais: seis diferentes leituras e a perspectiva de estruturação. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, v. 10, ed. spe. 1, p. 159-196, 2006.
  • MACHADO-DA-SILVA, C. L.; FONSECA, V. S.; CRUBELLATE, J. M. Estrutura, agência e interpretação: elementos para uma abordagem recursiva do processo de institucionalização. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, ed. spe., art. 4, p. 77-107, 2010.
  • MACKIEWICZ, M., & NAMYŚLAK, B. (2021). Development conditions for creative clusters in Poland in view of institutional environment factors. Growth and Change, 52(3), 1295-1311.
  • MEHER, J.R., & MISHRA, R.K. (2019). Assessing the influence of knowledge management practices on organizational performance: an ISM approach. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 49(3), 440-456.
  • MITCHELL, W., WU, Z., BRUTON, G.D., & GAUTAM, D.K. (2022). Microlevel analysis of institutional intermediation in a rudimentary market-based economy: entrepreneurship in Kathmandu’s Indrachok market. Organization Science, 33(6), 2106-2134.
  • MONTICELLI, J.M., GARRIDO, I.L., VIEIRA, L.M., CHIM-MIKI, A.F., & CARNEIRO, J. (2022). Can competitors cooperate? The impact of formal institution agents in promoting coopetition among emerging market exporters. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 37(9), 1915-1932.
  • OLSON, M. (2015). A lógica da ação coletiva. São Paulo: Edusp.
  • RUFFONI, J., GARCIA, R.D.C., & ROEHRIG, A. (2022). Footwear cluster’s decline in the South of Brazil: the transformation of a supercluster. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 32(5), 840-857.
  • SAIFI, I.A., SIDDIQUI, A.F., & HASSAN, A. (2018). Impact of knowledge sharing on organizational performance. Organization Theory Review, 2(2), 19-40.
  • SCOTT, W. R. Institutions and organizations: ideas and interests. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, 2008.
  • SCOTT, S., HUGHES, M., & KRAUS, S. (2019). Developing relationships in innovation clusters. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 31(1-2), 22-45.
  • SPIGEL, B., & HARRISON, R. (2018). Toward a process theory of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 151-168.
  • VASCONCELOS, F. C. A institucionalização das estratégias de negócios: o caso das startups na internet brasileira em uma perspectiva construtivista. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, v. 8, n. 2, p. 159-179, 2004.
  • VO, L-C., CULIÉ, J-D., & MOUNOUD, E. (2016). Microfoundations of decoupling: from a coping theory perspective. M@n@gement, 19(4), 248-276.
  • WEBER, M. Economia e sociedade: fundamentos da sociologia compreensiva. 3. ed. v. 1. Brasília: UnB, 1994.
  • WEGNER, D., SARTURI, G., & KLEIN, L.L. (2022). The governance of strategic networks: how do different configurations influence the performance of member firms?. Journal of Management and Governance, 26(3), 1063-1087.
  • ZIETSMA, C., & LAWRENCE, T.B. (2010). Institutional work in the transformation of an organizational field: the interplay of boundary work and practice work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(2), 189-222.

Complementar:

  • AGRESTI, A., & FINLAY, B. (2017). Statistical methods for the social sciences (5th ed.). Harlow: Pearson.
  • BORDIEU, P. The logic of practice. Oxford: Polity Press, 1990.
  • BORDIEU, P.; PASSERON, J. C. A reprodução: elementos para uma teoria do sistema de ensino. Lisboa: Vega, 1970.
  • CORAIOLA, D. M.; JACOMETTI, M.; BARATTER, M. A.; GONÇALVES, S. A. Trabalho institucional e teoria da mudança gradual: reflexões sobre atores sociais, estratégias e contextos. In: ENCONTRO DE ESTUDOS ORGANIZACIONAIS, 7., 2012, Curitiba . Anais... Rio de Janeiro: ANPAD, 2012.
  • DAVENPORT, T. H.; PRUSAK, L. Conhecimento empresarial: como as organizações gerenciam o seu capital intelectual. 6. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Campus, 2002.
  • GALVIN, T. L. Examining institutional change: evidence from the founding dynamics of US health care interest associations. Academy of Management Journal, v. 45, n. 4, p. 673-699, 2002.
  • GODOY, A. S. Estudo de caso qualitativo. In: GODOI, C. K.; BANDEIRA-DE-MELLO, R.; SILVA, A. B. (Org.). Pesquisa qualitativa em estudos organizacionais: paradigmas, estratégias e modelos. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2006. p. 115-146.
  • HAIR, J.F., GABRIEL, M.L.D.S., SILVA, D., & BRAGA, S. (2019). Development and validation of attitudes measurement scales: fundamental and practical aspects. RAUSP Management Journal, 54, 490-507.
  • HANSSEN-BAUER, J.; SNOW, C. C. Responding to hypercompetition: the structure and process of regional learning network organization. Organization Science, v. 7, n. 4, p. 413-427, 1996.
  • KAGHAN, W.; LOUNSBURY, M. Institution and work. Journal of Management Inquiry, v. 20, n. 1, p. 73-81, 2011.
  • LANZARA, G. F.; PATRIOTTA, G. The institutionalization of knowledge in an automotive factory: templates, inscriptions, and the problem of durability. Organization Studies, v. 28, n. 5, p. 635-660, 2007.
  • MACHADO-DA-SILVA, C. L.; COSER, C. Rede de relaçőes interorganizacionais no campo organizacional de Videira-SC. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, v. 10, n. 4, p. 9-45, 2006.
  • MOHR, J. W.; WHITE, H. C. How to model an institution. Theory and Society, v. 37, p. 485-512, 2008.
  • NONAKA, I. The spiral of knowledge creation: theory and cases, Beijing: The press of intellectual property rights, 2006.
  • NONAKA, I.; VON KROGH, G. Tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organization Science, v. 20, n. 3, p. 635-652, 2009.
  • PHELPS, C.; HEIDL, R.; WADHWA, A. Knowledge, networks, and knowledge networks: a review and research agenda. Journal of Management, v. 38, n. 4, p. 1115-1166, 2012.
  • POPPER, K. R. Conhecimento objetivo: uma abordagem evolucionária. Belo Horizonte, MG: Itatiaia, 1975.
  • SMOTHERS, J.; MURPHY, P.J.; NOVICEVIC, M.M.; HUMPHREYS, J.H. Institutional entrepreneurship as emancipating institutional work: James Meredith and the Integrationist Movement at Ole Miss. Journal of Management History, v. 20, n. 1, p. 114-134, 2014.
  • YONG-MI, K.; NEWBY-BENNETT, D.; SONG, H. Knowledge sharing and institutionalism in the healthcare industry. Journal of Knowledge Management, v. 16, n. 3, p. 480-494, 2012.
  • YIN, R.K. (2005). Estudo de caso: planejamento e métodos. (3a. ed.) Porto Alegre: Bookman.
  • ZUCKER, L. G. The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. American Sociological Review, v. 42, n. 5, p. 726-743, 1977.
Reportar erro