Home
/
Área Acadêmica
/
Disciplinas
/
Teoria das Organizações

Teoria das Organizações

Publicado 6/3/2024, 4:34:05 PM, última modificação 4/30/2025, 9:32:20 AM

Origem e fundamentos da Teoria das Organizações.Estado da arte das pesquisas nos estudos organizacionais. Racionalidade. Burocracia. Cultura organizacional. Poder e controle nas organizações. Estrutura organizacional. Teorias ambientais. Abordagens contemporâneas em Teoria das Organizações.

Bibliografia da Disciplina:

  • Adler, P. et al. (2007). Critical Management Studies. Academy of Management Annals, 1(1).
  • Alcadipani, R., Hassard, J., & Islam, G. (2018). “I shot the sheriff”: Irony, sarcasm and the changing nature of workplace resistance. Journal of Management Studies, 55(8), 1452-1487.
  • Barber IV, B., & Blake, D. J. (2024). My kind of people: Political polarization, ideology, and firm location. Strategic Management Journal, 45(5), 849-874.
  • Barros, M. (2018). Digitally crafting a resistant professional identity: The case of Brazilian ‘dirty’ bloggers. Organization, 25(6), 755-783.
  • Benton, R. A., Cobb, J. A., & Werner, T. (2022). Firm partisan positioning, polarization, and risk communication: Examining voluntary disclosures on COVID‐19. Strategic Management Journal, 43(4), 697-723.
  • Berti, M., & Cunha, M. P. E. (2023). Paradox, dialectics or trade‐offs? A double loop model of paradox. Journal of Management Studies, 60(4), 861-888.
  • Cameron, L. D. (2022). “Making out” while driving: Relational and efficiency games in the gig economy. Organization Science, 33(1), 231-252.
  • Cameron, L. D. (2024). The Making of the “Good Bad” Job: How Algorithmic Management Manufactures Consent Through Constant and Confined Choices. Administrative Science Quarterly, 69(2), 458-514.
  • Campbell, N., McHugh, G., & Ennis, P. (2019). Climate Change Is Not a Problem: Speculative Realism at the End of Organization. Organization Studies, 40(5), 725–744.
  • Castelló, I., Etter, M., & Årup Nielsen, F. (2016). Strategies of legitimacy through social media: The networked strategy. Journal of Management Studies, 53(3), 402-432.
  • Courpasson, D. (2017). Beyond the hidden/public resistance divide: How bloggers defeated a big company. Organization Studies, 38(9), 1277-1302.
  • Davis, G. (2016). Can an economy survive without corporations? Technology and robust organizational alternatives. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(2), 129-140.
  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
  • Fleming, P., & Spicer, A. (2014). Power in Management and Organization Science. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1).
  • Fleeming, P. (2019). Robots and Organization Studies: Why Robots Might Not Want to Steal Your Job. Organization Studies, 40(1), 23-38.
  • Gaim, M., Clegg, S., & Cunha, M. P. E. (2021). Managing impressions rather than emissions: Volkswagen and the false mastery of paradox. Organization Studies, 42(6), 949-970.
  • Giorgi, S. et al. (2015). The Many Faces of Culture: Making Sense of 30 Years of Research on Culture in Organization Studies. Academy of Management Annals, 9(1).
  • Gualtieri, G., & Lurati, F. (2024). Being responsible in a polarized world: From dialogical to partisan CSR. Management Communication Quarterly, 38(4), 801-833.
  • Hassard, J., & Walfram-Cox, J. (n.d.). Can Sociological Paradigms Still Inform Organizational Analysis? A Paradigm Model for Post-Paradigm Times. Organization Studies, 34(11).
  • Heikkurinen, P., Clegg, S., Pinnington, A. H., Nicolopoulou, K., & Alcaraz, J. M. (2019). Managing the Anthropocene: Relational Agency and Power to Respect Planetary Boundaries. Organization & Environment.
  • Ibarra Colado, E. (2006). Organization studies and epistemic coloniality in Latin America: Thinking otherness from the margins. Organization, 13(4).
  • Joachim, M., Castelló, I., & Parry, G. (2024). Moving Beyond “Facts Are Facts”: Managing Emotions and Legitimacy After a Fake News Attack. Business & Society, 00076503241281632.
  • Karunakaran, A. (2024). Frontline Professionals in the Wake of Social Media Scrutiny: Examining the Processes of Obscured Accountability. Administrative Science Quarterly, 00018392241256303.
  • Maitlis, S., & Christianson, M. (2014). Sensemaking in Organizations: Taking Stock and Moving Forward. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1).
  • Mariconda, S., Pizzetti, M., Etter, M., & Haack, P. (2024). Fooling them, not me? How fake news affects evaluators’ reputation judgments and behavioral intentions. Business & Society, 00076503241271255.
  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutional organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363.
  • Mohliver, A., Crilly, D., & Kaul, A. (2023). Corporate social counterpositioning: How attributes of social issues influence competitive response. Strategic Management Journal, 44(5), 1199-1217.
  • Morandin, G., Russo, M., & Ollier-Malaterre, A. (2018). Put down that phone! Smart use of smartphones for work and beyond. Journal of Management Inquiry, 27(3), 352-356.
  • Morgan, G. (n.d.). Images of Organizations. Capítulos: Introduction, Machines, Live Organisms, Cultures, and Domination.
  • Motta, F. C. P., Alcadipani, R., & Bresler, R. B. (2001). A valorização do estrangeiro como segregação nas organizações. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 5, 59-79.
  • Perrow, C. (1991). A society of organizations: An elephantine problem. Theory and Society, 20.
  • Pratt, M. G. (2000). The good, the bad, and the ambivalent: Managing identification among Amway distributors. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 456-493.
  • Pratt, M. G. (2003). Fostering meaningfulness in working and at work. In Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline. Berrett-Koehler.
  • Schein, E. (1984). Coming to a New Awareness of Organizational Culture. Sloan Management Review, 25(2).
  • Wright, C., Nyberg, D., Rickards, L., & Freund, J. (2018). Organizing in the Anthropocene. Organization, 25(4), 193–209.



Reportar erro